Which is better, RATI.TA or USAC?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, Ratio Energies - Limited Partnership (RATI.TA) currently grades higher than USAC — 72/100 (B grade) vs 71/100 (C). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — RATI.TA wins on Warren Buffett, Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, Joel Greenblatt, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith; USAC wins on Peter Lynch. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy RATI.TA or USAC?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both RATI.TA and USAC are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is RATI.TA better than USAC for value investing?

The two are close on the headline Buffett-Fit score (72/100 vs 71/100), so "better for value investing" depends on which pillar you weight most. The five Buffett pillars + six other frameworks are broken down side-by-side on this page so you can pick the one that fits your style.

What's the difference between RATI.TA and USAC on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). RATI.TA currently scores 72/100 (B grade); USAC scores 71/100 (C grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, RATI.TA or USAC?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. RATI.TA and USAC are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, RATI.TA or USAC?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are RATI.TA and USAC both Energy stocks?

Yes — both Ratio Energies - Limited Partnership (RATI.TA) and USA Compression Partners, LP (USAC) operate in the Energy sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this RATI.TA vs USAC comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

Ratio Energies - Limited Partnership

RATI.TA$4.78BEnergy Market cap, Sector

USA Compression Partners, LP

USAC$3.83BEnergy Market cap, Sector

Overall winner

Ratio Energies - Limited Partnership

RATI.TA 61 USAC

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

Fit scores by strategy

RATI.TA6wins

1winsUSAC

Warren Buffett

72B

B71

Benjamin Graham

91A

A86

Philip Fisher

64C

C63

Peter Lynch

31F

B73

Joel Greenblatt

59D

F37

Charlie Munger

83B

B70

Terry Smith

77B

C66

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	RATI.TA	USAC
Market cap	Winner: $4.78B	$3.83B
P/E (TTM)	40.2x	32.8x Winner
EV/EBIT	28.2x	20.6x Winner
ROIC (TTM)	Winner: 14.65%	8.89%
Gross margin	Winner: 59.24%	51.61%
Net margin	Winner: 37.39%	11.91%
Revenue CAGR 5y	-4.11%	12.07% Winner
EPS CAGR 5y	-5.73%	-
Debt / Equity	Winner: 1.0x	9.5x
Dividend yield	-	7.08%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

RATI.TA leads on

Debt / Equity1.0xvs 9.5x+89%
Net margin37.39%vs 11.91%+68%
ROIC (TTM)14.65%vs 8.89%+39%
Market cap$4.78Bvs $3.83B+20%

USAC leads on

Revenue CAGR 5y12.07%vs -4.11%+134%
EV/EBIT20.6xvs 28.2x+27%
P/E (TTM)32.8xvs 40.2x+18%

More like RATI.TA

RATI.TA vs TPL RATI.TA vs VAR.OL RATI.TA vs GTT.PA RATI.TA vs COALINDIA.NS

More like USAC

USAC vs TPL USAC vs VAR.OL USAC vs GTT.PA USAC vs COALINDIA.NS

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for RATI.TA Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for USAC

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.

Stock comparison

Ratio Energies - Limited Partnership

RATI.TA$4.78BEnergy Market cap, Sector

USA Compression Partners, LP

USAC$3.83BEnergy Market cap, Sector

Overall winner

Ratio Energies - Limited Partnership

RATI.TA 61 USAC

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

Fit scores by strategy

RATI.TA6wins

1winsUSAC

Warren Buffett

72B

B71

Benjamin Graham

91A

A86

Philip Fisher

64C

C63

Peter Lynch

31F

B73

Joel Greenblatt

59D

F37

Charlie Munger

83B

B70

Terry Smith

77B

C66

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	RATI.TA	USAC
Market cap	Winner: $4.78B	$3.83B
P/E (TTM)	40.2x	32.8x Winner
EV/EBIT	28.2x	20.6x Winner
ROIC (TTM)	Winner: 14.65%	8.89%
Gross margin	Winner: 59.24%	51.61%
Net margin	Winner: 37.39%	11.91%
Revenue CAGR 5y	-4.11%	12.07% Winner
EPS CAGR 5y	-5.73%	-
Debt / Equity	Winner: 1.0x	9.5x
Dividend yield	-	7.08%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

RATI.TA leads on

Debt / Equity1.0xvs 9.5x+89%
Net margin37.39%vs 11.91%+68%
ROIC (TTM)14.65%vs 8.89%+39%
Market cap$4.78Bvs $3.83B+20%

USAC leads on

Revenue CAGR 5y12.07%vs -4.11%+134%
EV/EBIT20.6xvs 28.2x+27%
P/E (TTM)32.8xvs 40.2x+18%

More like RATI.TA

RATI.TA vs TPL RATI.TA vs VAR.OL RATI.TA vs GTT.PA RATI.TA vs COALINDIA.NS

More like USAC

USAC vs TPL USAC vs VAR.OL USAC vs GTT.PA USAC vs COALINDIA.NS

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for RATI.TA Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for USAC

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.