Stock comparison
VinFast Auto
VFS$8.96BConsumer Discretionary Market cap, Sector
XPeng
XPEV$14.84BConsumer Discretionary Market cap, Sector
Overall winner
VinFast Auto
VFS 42 XPEV
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
Fit scores by strategy
VFS4wins
2winsXPEV
25F
F13
0F
F34
34F
F19
43F
D57
0F
F0
26F
F6
32F
F7
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | VFS | XPEV |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $8.96B | $14.84B Winner |
| P/E (TTM) | - | - Winner |
| EV/EBIT | - | - Winner |
| ROIC (TTM) | -91.45% | -6.88% Winner |
| Gross margin | -42.53% | 18.85% Winner |
| Net margin | -107.31% | -1.5% Winner |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | Winner: 54.12% | 37.32% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | - | - |
| Debt / Equity | Winner: - | 1.0x |
| Dividend yield | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
VFS leads on
- Debt / Equity-vs 1.0x+163%
- Revenue CAGR 5y54.12%vs 37.32%+31%
XPEV leads on
- Gross margin18.85%vs -42.53%+144%
- Net margin-1.5%vs -107.31%+99%
- P/E (TTM)-vs -+97%
- ROIC (TTM)-6.88%vs -91.45%+92%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.