Stock comparison
Applied Materials
Vontier
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
AMAT
Applied Materials
Market cap
$343.12B
Sector
Technology
VNT
Vontier
Market cap
$4.17B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Applied Materials AMAT
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | AMAT | VNT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 76B | 60C | AMAT |
| Benjamin Graham | 87A | 64C | AMAT |
| Philip Fisher | 65B | 41D | AMAT |
| Peter Lynch | 65B | 57C | AMAT |
| Joel Greenblatt | 66C | 35D | AMAT |
| Charlie Munger | 75B | 54C | AMAT |
| Terry Smith | 71B | 51D | AMAT |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | AMAT | VNT |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $343.12B | $4.17B |
| P/E (TTM) | 40.0x | 9.6x |
| EV/EBIT | 41.0x | 10.1x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 21.6% | 13.29% |
| Gross margin | 48.96% | 46.54% |
| Net margin | 29.31% | 13.37% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 5.31% | 0.7% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 7.72% | 3.22% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.3x | 1.5x |
| Dividend yield | 0.45% | 0.36% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
AMAT leads on
- Market cap$343.12Bvs $4.17B+99%
- Revenue CAGR 5y5.31%vs 0.7%+87%
- Debt / Equity0.3xvs 1.5x+82%
- EPS CAGR 5y7.72%vs 3.22%+58%
VNT leads on
- P/E (TTM)9.6xvs 40.0x+76%
- EV/EBIT10.1xvs 41.0x+75%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.