Which is better, CHT or VZ?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (CHT) currently grades higher than VZ — 58/100 (C grade) vs 52/100 (D). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — CHT wins on Warren Buffett, Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, Peter Lynch, and Joel Greenblatt; VZ wins on Charlie Munger and Terry Smith. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy CHT or VZ?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both CHT and VZ are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is CHT better than VZ for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, CHT currently grades higher — 58/100 vs 52/100, a 6-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between CHT and VZ on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). CHT currently scores 58/100 (C grade); VZ scores 52/100 (D grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, CHT or VZ?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. CHT and VZ are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, CHT or VZ?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are CHT and VZ both Communication Services stocks?

Yes — both Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (CHT) and Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) operate in the Communication Services sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this CHT vs VZ comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

Chunghwa Telecom

Verizon

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

CHT

Chunghwa Telecom

Market cap

$33.88B

Sector

Communication Services

Verizon

Market cap

$201.89B

Sector

Communication Services

Overall winner

Chunghwa Telecom CHT

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Fit scores by strategy

Strategy	CHT	VZ	Winner
Warren Buffett	58C	52D	CHT
Benjamin Graham	70B	50C	CHT
Philip Fisher

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	CHT	VZ
Market cap	$33.88B	$201.89B
P/E (TTM)	27.9x	11.6x
EV/EBIT	22.0x	13.2x
ROIC (TTM)	8.58%	5.99%
Gross margin	35.78%	58.85%
Net margin	16.41%	12.46%
Revenue CAGR 5y	3.04%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

CHT leads on

EPS CAGR 5y2.0%vs -6.53%+131%
Debt / Equity0.1xvs 1.9x+95%
Revenue CAGR 5y3.04%vs 0.85%+72%
ROIC (TTM)8.58%vs 5.99%

More like CHT

CHT vs META CHT vs GOOGL CHT vs GOOG CHT vs NFLX CHT vs TME CHT vs TTD

More like VZ

VZ vs META

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.