Stock comparison
Hess Midstream LP
Woodside Energy Group
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
HESM
Hess Midstream LP
Market cap
$8.28B
Sector
Energy
WDS
Woodside Energy Group
Market cap
$43.13B
Sector
Energy
Overall winner
Hess Midstream LP HESM
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | HESM | WDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 69C | 33F | HESM |
| Benjamin Graham | 73B | 39D | HESM |
| Philip Fisher | 69C | 37D | HESM |
| Peter Lynch | 54C | 33F | HESM |
| Joel Greenblatt | 42D | 24F | HESM |
| Charlie Munger | 77C | 36D | HESM |
| Terry Smith | 74C | 25F | HESM |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | HESM | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $8.28B | $43.13B |
| P/E (TTM) | 13.7x | 15.4x |
| EV/EBIT | 11.8x | 14.6x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 20.59% | 4.17% |
| Gross margin | 69.45% | 32.19% |
| Net margin | 22.65% | 20.96% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 7.73% | 16.86% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 12.21% | -8.72% |
| Debt / Equity | 10.1x | 0.4x |
| Dividend yield | 7.74% | 5.29% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
HESM leads on
- EPS CAGR 5y12.21%vs -8.72%+171%
- ROIC (TTM)20.59%vs 4.17%+80%
- Gross margin69.45%vs 32.19%+54%
- Dividend yield7.74%vs 5.29%+32%
WDS leads on
- Debt / Equity0.4xvs 10.1x+96%
- Market cap$43.13Bvs $8.28B+81%
- Revenue CAGR 5y16.86%vs 7.73%+54%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.