Which is better, ROL or WH?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, Rollins, Inc. (ROL) currently grades higher than WH — 68/100 (B grade) vs 53/100 (C). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — ROL wins on Warren Buffett, Philip Fisher, Peter Lynch, Joel Greenblatt, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith; WH wins on Benjamin Graham. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy ROL or WH?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both ROL and WH are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is ROL better than WH for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, ROL currently grades higher — 68/100 vs 53/100, a 15-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between ROL and WH on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). ROL currently scores 68/100 (B grade); WH scores 53/100 (C grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, ROL or WH?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. ROL and WH are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, ROL or WH?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are ROL and WH both Consumer Cyclical stocks?

Yes — both Rollins, Inc. (ROL) and Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (WH) operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this ROL vs WH comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

Rollins

Wyndham Hotels & Resorts

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

ROL

Rollins

Market cap

$25.51B

Sector

Consumer Discretionary

Wyndham Hotels & Resorts

Market cap

$6.14B

Sector

Consumer Discretionary

Overall winner

Rollins ROL

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Fit scores by strategy

Strategy	ROL	WH	Winner
Warren Buffett	68B	53C	ROL
Benjamin Graham	71B	75B	WH
Philip Fisher	63C	45D	ROL
Peter Lynch	63C	27F	ROL
Joel Greenblatt	57C	38D	ROL
Charlie Munger	67B	54C	ROL
Terry Smith	65B	51C	ROL

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	ROL	WH
Market cap	$25.51B	$6.14B
P/E (TTM)	48.2x	32.1x
EV/EBIT	36.3x	24.3x
ROIC (TTM)	20.69%	8.54%
Gross margin	51.78%	55.69%
Net margin	13.77%	13.4%
Revenue CAGR 5y	11.6%	-2.25%
EPS CAGR 5y	10.92%	-1.17%
Debt / Equity	0.8x	8.5x
Dividend yield	1.34%	2.02%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

ROL leads on

Revenue CAGR 5y11.6%vs -2.25%+119%
EPS CAGR 5y10.92%vs -1.17%+111%
Debt / Equity0.8xvs 8.5x+91%
Market cap$25.51Bvs $6.14B+76%

WH leads on

Dividend yield2.02%vs 1.34%+34%
P/E (TTM)32.1xvs 48.2x+33%
EV/EBIT24.3xvs 36.3x+33%
Gross margin55.69%vs 51.78%+7%

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.

Rollins

Wyndham Hotels & Resorts

Fit scores by strategy

Side-by-side metrics

Where each one wins

More like ROL

More like WH

Related on invest-like

Key terms in this analysis