Stock comparison
Applied Materials
Workiva
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
AMAT
Applied Materials
Market cap
$343.12B
Sector
Technology
WK
Workiva
Market cap
$2.82B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Applied Materials AMAT
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | AMAT | WK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 76B | 43D | AMAT |
| Benjamin Graham | 87A | 20F | AMAT |
| Philip Fisher | 65B | 55C | AMAT |
| Peter Lynch | 65B | 58C | AMAT |
| Joel Greenblatt | 66C | 3F | AMAT |
| Charlie Munger | 75B | 44D | AMAT |
| Terry Smith | 71B | 43D | AMAT |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | AMAT | WK |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $343.12B | $2.82B |
| P/E (TTM) | 40.0x | 205.5x |
| EV/EBIT | 41.0x | - |
| ROIC (TTM) | 21.6% | -0.23% |
| Gross margin | 48.96% | 79.4% |
| Net margin | 29.31% | 1.53% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 5.31% | 18.85% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 7.72% | - |
| Debt / Equity | 0.3x | - |
| Dividend yield | 0.45% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
AMAT leads on
- ROIC (TTM)21.6%vs -0.23%+101%
- Dividend yield0.45%vs 0.0%+100%
- Market cap$343.12Bvs $2.82B+99%
- Net margin29.31%vs 1.53%+95%
WK leads on
- EV/EBIT-vs 41.0x+152%
- Debt / Equity-vs 0.3x+100%
- Revenue CAGR 5y18.85%vs 5.31%+72%
- Gross margin79.4%vs 48.96%+38%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.