Which is better, GPP.WA or WM?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, Grupa Pracuj S.A. (GPP.WA) currently grades higher than WM — 77/100 (B grade) vs 51/100 (C). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — GPP.WA wins on Warren Buffett, Philip Fisher, Joel Greenblatt, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith; WM wins on Benjamin Graham and Peter Lynch. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy GPP.WA or WM?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both GPP.WA and WM are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is GPP.WA better than WM for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, GPP.WA currently grades higher — 77/100 vs 51/100, a 26-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between GPP.WA and WM on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). GPP.WA currently scores 77/100 (B grade); WM scores 51/100 (C grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, GPP.WA or WM?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. GPP.WA and WM are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, GPP.WA or WM?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are GPP.WA and WM both Industrials stocks?

Yes — both Grupa Pracuj S.A. (GPP.WA) and Waste Management, Inc. (WM) operate in the Industrials sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this GPP.WA vs WM comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

Grupa Pracuj

GPP.WA$3.21BIndustrials Market cap, Sector

Waste Management

WM$93.64BIndustrials Market cap, Sector

Overall winner

Grupa Pracuj

GPP.WA 52 WM

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

Fit scores by strategy

GPP.WA5wins

2winsWM

Warren Buffett

77B

D51

Benjamin Graham

58D

B75

Philip Fisher

69C

D48

Peter Lynch

45D

C63

Joel Greenblatt

56D

F39

Charlie Munger

77B

D52

Terry Smith

84B

D48

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	GPP.WA	WM
Market cap	$3.21B	$93.64B Winner
P/E (TTM)	Winner: 13.3x	30.6x
EV/EBIT	Winner: 9.9x	23.4x
ROIC (TTM)	Winner: 39.1%	9.02%
Gross margin	-	32.06%
Net margin	Winner: 29.42%	10.99%
Revenue CAGR 5y	Winner: 10.06%	8.88%
EPS CAGR 5y	Winner: 12.96%	11.68%
Debt / Equity	Winner: 0.3x	2.3x
Dividend yield	-	1.61%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

GPP.WA leads on

Debt / Equity0.3xvs 2.3x+87%
ROIC (TTM)39.1%vs 9.02%+77%
Net margin29.42%vs 10.99%+63%
EV/EBIT9.9xvs 23.4x+58%

WM leads on

Market cap$93.64Bvs $3.21B+97%

More like GPP.WA

GPP.WA vs 6532.T GPP.WA vs SALIK.AE GPP.WA vs CTAS GPP.WA vs RAA.DE

More like WM

WM vs 6532.T WM vs SALIK.AE WM vs CTAS WM vs RAA.DE

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for GPP.WA Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for WM

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.

Stock comparison

Grupa Pracuj

GPP.WA$3.21BIndustrials Market cap, Sector

Waste Management

WM$93.64BIndustrials Market cap, Sector

Overall winner

Grupa Pracuj

GPP.WA 52 WM

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

Fit scores by strategy

GPP.WA5wins

2winsWM

Warren Buffett

77B

D51

Benjamin Graham

58D

B75

Philip Fisher

69C

D48

Peter Lynch

45D

C63

Joel Greenblatt

56D

F39

Charlie Munger

77B

D52

Terry Smith

84B

D48

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	GPP.WA	WM
Market cap	$3.21B	$93.64B Winner
P/E (TTM)	Winner: 13.3x	30.6x
EV/EBIT	Winner: 9.9x	23.4x
ROIC (TTM)	Winner: 39.1%	9.02%
Gross margin	-	32.06%
Net margin	Winner: 29.42%	10.99%
Revenue CAGR 5y	Winner: 10.06%	8.88%
EPS CAGR 5y	Winner: 12.96%	11.68%
Debt / Equity	Winner: 0.3x	2.3x
Dividend yield	-	1.61%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

GPP.WA leads on

Debt / Equity0.3xvs 2.3x+87%
ROIC (TTM)39.1%vs 9.02%+77%
Net margin29.42%vs 10.99%+63%
EV/EBIT9.9xvs 23.4x+58%

WM leads on

Market cap$93.64Bvs $3.21B+97%

More like GPP.WA

GPP.WA vs 6532.T GPP.WA vs SALIK.AE GPP.WA vs CTAS GPP.WA vs RAA.DE

More like WM

WM vs 6532.T WM vs SALIK.AE WM vs CTAS WM vs RAA.DE

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for GPP.WA Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for WM

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.