Stock comparison
Ulta Beauty
Yum China Holdings
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
ULTA
Ulta Beauty
Market cap
$22.53B
Sector
Consumer Discretionary
YUMC
Yum China Holdings
Market cap
$15.64B
Sector
Consumer Discretionary
Overall winner
Ulta Beauty ULTA
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | ULTA | YUMC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 68B | 31F | ULTA |
| Benjamin Graham | 68B | 57C | ULTA |
| Philip Fisher | 47D | 20F | ULTA |
| Peter Lynch | 53C | 48D | ULTA |
| Joel Greenblatt | 47D | 28F | ULTA |
| Charlie Munger | 61C | 22F | ULTA |
| Terry Smith | 60C | 21F | ULTA |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | ULTA | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $22.53B | $15.64B |
| P/E (TTM) | 19.2x | 17.7x |
| EV/EBIT | 15.1x | 12.4x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 22.75% | 12.18% |
| Gross margin | 39.1% | 17.23% |
| Net margin | 9.31% | 7.83% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 9.47% | 4.6% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 9.2% | 1.86% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.8x | 0.3x |
| Dividend yield | 0.0% | 2.13% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
ULTA leads on
- EPS CAGR 5y9.2%vs 1.86%+80%
- Gross margin39.1%vs 17.23%+56%
- Revenue CAGR 5y9.47%vs 4.6%+51%
- ROIC (TTM)22.75%vs 12.18%+46%
YUMC leads on
- Dividend yield2.13%vs 0.0%+100%
- Debt / Equity0.3xvs 0.8x+56%
- EV/EBIT12.4xvs 15.1x+18%
- P/E (TTM)17.7xvs 19.2x+8%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.