Stock comparison
Applied Materials
Ingram Micro
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
AMAT
Applied Materials
Market cap
$342.97B
Sector
Technology
INGM
Ingram Micro
Market cap
$6.17B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Applied Materials AMAT
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | AMAT | INGM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 76B | 31F | AMAT |
| Benjamin Graham | 87A | 41D | AMAT |
| Philip Fisher | 65B | 12F | AMAT |
| Peter Lynch | 65B | 5F | AMAT |
| Joel Greenblatt | 66C | 13F | AMAT |
| Charlie Munger | 75B | 23F | AMAT |
| Terry Smith | 71B | 27F | AMAT |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | AMAT | INGM |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $342.97B | $6.17B |
| P/E (TTM) | 40.0x | 17.2x |
| EV/EBIT | 41.0x | 6.9x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 21.6% | 7.37% |
| Gross margin | 48.96% | 6.64% |
| Net margin | 29.31% | 0.66% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 5.31% | -0.88% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 7.72% | -8.76% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.3x | 0.3x |
| Dividend yield | 0.45% | 1.23% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
AMAT leads on
- EPS CAGR 5y7.72%vs -8.76%+188%
- Revenue CAGR 5y5.31%vs -0.88%+117%
- Market cap$342.97Bvs $6.17B+98%
- Net margin29.31%vs 0.66%+98%
INGM leads on
- EV/EBIT6.9xvs 41.0x+83%
- Dividend yield1.23%vs 0.45%+64%
- P/E (TTM)17.2xvs 40.0x+57%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.