Stock comparison
Applied Materials
Innodata
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
AMAT
Applied Materials
Market cap
$346.51B
Sector
Technology
INOD
Innodata
Market cap
$3.09B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Applied Materials AMAT
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | AMAT | INOD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 76B | 46D | AMAT |
| Benjamin Graham | 87A | 67D | AMAT |
| Philip Fisher | 66B | 66C | Tie |
| Peter Lynch | 65B | 69B | INOD |
| Joel Greenblatt | 66C | 64C | AMAT |
| Charlie Munger | 75B | 59D | AMAT |
| Terry Smith | 71B | 62C | AMAT |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | AMAT | INOD |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $346.51B | $3.09B |
| P/E (TTM) | 40.7x | 78.6x |
| EV/EBIT | 41.8x | 74.1x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 21.6% | 25.89% |
| Gross margin | 48.96% | 40.92% |
| Net margin | 29.31% | 13.86% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 5.31% | 37.82% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 7.72% | - |
| Debt / Equity | 0.3x | 0.0x |
| Dividend yield | 0.42% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
AMAT leads on
- Dividend yield0.42%vs 0.0%+100%
- Market cap$346.51Bvs $3.09B+99%
- Net margin29.31%vs 13.86%+53%
- P/E (TTM)40.7xvs 78.6x+48%
INOD leads on
- Debt / Equity0.0xvs 0.3x+88%
- Revenue CAGR 5y37.82%vs 5.31%+86%
- ROIC (TTM)25.89%vs 21.6%+17%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.