Which is better, BNP.WA or IBKD.SI?

BNP.WA and IBKD.SI tie on the headline Buffett-Fit score (59/100 each). The decision comes down to which underlying framework you trust most — BNP.WA leads on Philip Fisher, Peter Lynch, and Joel Greenblatt; IBKD.SI leads on Warren Buffett, Benjamin Graham, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith. The pillar-by-pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy BNP.WA or IBKD.SI?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both BNP.WA and IBKD.SI are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is BNP.WA better than IBKD.SI for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, IBKD.SI currently grades higher — 68/100 vs 59/100, a 9-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between BNP.WA and IBKD.SI on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). BNP.WA currently scores 59/100 (C grade); IBKD.SI scores 68/100 (B grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, BNP.WA or IBKD.SI?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. BNP.WA and IBKD.SI are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, BNP.WA or IBKD.SI?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are BNP.WA and IBKD.SI both Financial Services stocks?

Yes — both BNP Paribas Bank Polska S.A. (BNP.WA) and i BBCA ID SDR 1to2 (IBKD.SI) operate in the Financial Services sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this BNP.WA vs IBKD.SI comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

BNP Paribas Bank Polska

BNP.WA$22.81BFinancials Market cap, Sector

i BBCA ID SDR 1to2

IBKD.SI$113.66BFinancials Market cap, Sector

Overall winner

Tie

BNP.WA 34 IBKD.SI

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

Fit scores by strategy

BNP.WA3wins

4winsIBKD.SI

Warren Buffett

59D

C68

Benjamin Graham

39F

C68

Philip Fisher

71B

C69

Peter Lynch

53D

D52

Joel Greenblatt

96A

F27

Charlie Munger

57D

C69

Terry Smith

50D

B72

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	BNP.WA	IBKD.SI
Market cap	$22.81B	$113.66B Winner
P/E (TTM)	Winner: 7.1x	26.2x
EV/EBIT	-	-
ROIC (TTM)	-	-
Gross margin	-	-
Net margin	36.51%	50.33% Winner
Revenue CAGR 5y	Winner: 14.81%	8.49%
EPS CAGR 5y	Winner: 90.24%	12.21%
Debt / Equity	0.8x	0.0x Winner
Dividend yield	-	-

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

BNP.WA leads on

EPS CAGR 5y90.24%vs 12.21%+86%
P/E (TTM)7.1xvs 26.2x+73%
Revenue CAGR 5y14.81%vs 8.49%+43%

IBKD.SI leads on

Debt / Equity0.0xvs 0.8x+99%
Market cap$113.66Bvs $22.81B+80%
Net margin50.33%vs 36.51%+27%

More like BNP.WA

BNP.WA vs FBK.MI BNP.WA vs AZA.ST BNP.WA vs BGN.MI BNP.WA vs CPI.JO

More like IBKD.SI

IBKD.SI vs FBK.MI IBKD.SI vs AZA.ST IBKD.SI vs BGN.MI IBKD.SI vs CPI.JO

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for BNP.WA Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for IBKD.SI

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.