Stock comparison
A10 Networks
Cadence Design Systems
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
ATEN
A10 Networks
Market cap
$2.16B
Sector
Technology
CDNS
Cadence Design Systems
Market cap
$103.04B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Cadence Design Systems CDNS
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | ATEN | CDNS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 75B | 78B | CDNS |
| Benjamin Graham | 92A | 84A | ATEN |
| Philip Fisher | 58C | 84A | CDNS |
| Peter Lynch | 27F | 78B | CDNS |
| Joel Greenblatt | 52C | 58C | CDNS |
| Charlie Munger | 74C | 80A | CDNS |
| Terry Smith | 70B | 80A | CDNS |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | ATEN | CDNS |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $2.16B | $103.04B |
| P/E (TTM) | 43.9x | 80.7x |
| EV/EBIT | 45.2x | 59.1x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 8.15% | 12.19% |
| Gross margin | 79.5% | 88.85% |
| Net margin | 14.9% | 21.18% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 3.83% | 15.38% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | -17.13% | 12.65% |
| Debt / Equity | 1.0x | 0.5x |
| Dividend yield | 0.88% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
ATEN leads on
- Dividend yield0.88%vs 0.0%+100%
- P/E (TTM)43.9xvs 80.7x+46%
- EV/EBIT45.2xvs 59.1x+23%
CDNS leads on
- EPS CAGR 5y12.65%vs -17.13%+174%
- Market cap$103.04Bvs $2.16B+98%
- Revenue CAGR 5y15.38%vs 3.83%+75%
- Debt / Equity0.5xvs 1.0x+53%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.