Stock comparison
Core Natural Resources
USA Compression Partners, LP
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
CNR
Core Natural Resources
Market cap
$4.2B
Sector
Energy
USAC
USA Compression Partners, LP
Market cap
$3.56B
Sector
Energy
Overall winner
USA Compression Partners, LP USAC
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | CNR | USAC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 19F | 69C | USAC |
| Benjamin Graham | 21F | 84A | USAC |
| Philip Fisher | 42D | 61C | USAC |
| Peter Lynch | 50C | 71C | USAC |
| Joel Greenblatt | 2F | 35D | USAC |
| Charlie Munger | 31F | 68D | USAC |
| Terry Smith | 29F | 64D | USAC |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | CNR | USAC |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $4.2B | $3.56B |
| P/E (TTM) | - | 32.8x |
| EV/EBIT | - | 20.6x |
| ROIC (TTM) | -1.17% | 8.89% |
| Gross margin | 0.76% | 51.61% |
| Net margin | -1.49% | 11.91% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 34.81% | 12.07% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | - | - |
| Debt / Equity | 0.1x | 9.5x |
| Dividend yield | 0.48% | 7.08% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
CNR leads on
- EV/EBIT-vs 20.6x+194%
- P/E (TTM)-vs 32.8x+149%
- Debt / Equity0.1xvs 9.5x+99%
- Revenue CAGR 5y34.81%vs 12.07%+65%
USAC leads on
- ROIC (TTM)8.89%vs -1.17%+113%
- Net margin11.91%vs -1.49%+112%
- Gross margin51.61%vs 0.76%+99%
- Dividend yield7.08%vs 0.48%+93%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.