Stock comparison
Cadence Design Systems
Grid Dynamics Holdings
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
CDNS
Cadence Design Systems
Market cap
$103.04B
Sector
Technology
GDYN
Grid Dynamics Holdings
Market cap
$596.25M
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Cadence Design Systems CDNS
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | CDNS | GDYN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 78B | 45D | CDNS |
| Benjamin Graham | 84A | 46D | CDNS |
| Philip Fisher | 84A | 56C | CDNS |
| Peter Lynch | 78B | 39D | CDNS |
| Joel Greenblatt | 58C | 41D | CDNS |
| Charlie Munger | 80A | 40D | CDNS |
| Terry Smith | 80A | 50D | CDNS |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | CDNS | GDYN |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $103.04B | $596.25M |
| P/E (TTM) | 80.7x | 108.5x |
| EV/EBIT | 59.1x | 110.7x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 12.19% | -0.24% |
| Gross margin | 88.85% | 34.07% |
| Net margin | 21.18% | 1.27% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 15.38% | 18.16% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 12.65% | - |
| Debt / Equity | 0.5x | 0.0x |
| Dividend yield | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
CDNS leads on
- ROIC (TTM)12.19%vs -0.24%+102%
- Market cap$103.04Bvs $596.25M+99%
- Net margin21.18%vs 1.27%+94%
- Gross margin88.85%vs 34.07%+62%
GDYN leads on
- Debt / Equity0.0xvs 0.5x+93%
- Revenue CAGR 5y18.16%vs 15.38%+15%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.