Which is better, GM or HLT?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT) currently grades higher than GM — 70/100 (B grade) vs 38/100 (D). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — GM wins on none; HLT wins on Warren Buffett, Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, Peter Lynch, Joel Greenblatt, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy GM or HLT?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both GM and HLT are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is GM better than HLT for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, HLT currently grades higher — 70/100 vs 38/100, a 32-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between GM and HLT on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). GM currently scores 38/100 (D grade); HLT scores 70/100 (B grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, GM or HLT?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. GM and HLT are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, GM or HLT?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are GM and HLT both Consumer Cyclical stocks?

Yes — both General Motors Company (GM) and Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT) operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this GM vs HLT comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

General Motors

Hilton Worldwide Holdings

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

General Motors

Market cap

$71.04B

Sector

Consumer Discretionary

HLT

Hilton Worldwide Holdings

Market cap

$73.09B

Sector

Consumer Discretionary

Overall winner

Hilton Worldwide Holdings HLT

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Fit scores by strategy

Strategy	GM	HLT	Winner
Warren Buffett	38D	70B	HLT
Benjamin Graham	52C	77B	HLT
Philip Fisher	17F	83A	HLT
Peter Lynch	23F	72B	HLT
Joel Greenblatt	45D	61C	HLT
Charlie Munger	22F	63C	HLT
Terry Smith	22F	64C	HLT

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	GM	HLT
Market cap	$71.04B	$73.09B
P/E (TTM)	27.1x	47.0x
EV/EBIT	60.3x	31.3x
ROIC (TTM)	1.01%	16.89%
Gross margin	6.1%	44.29%
Net margin	1.38%	12.56%
Revenue CAGR 5y	9.86%	20.09%
EPS CAGR 5y	-16.28%	43.19%
Debt / Equity	2.0x	-
Dividend yield	0.84%	0.19%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

GM leads on

Dividend yield0.84%vs 0.19%+77%
P/E (TTM)27.1xvs 47.0x+42%

HLT leads on

Debt / Equity-vs 2.0x+192%
EPS CAGR 5y43.19%vs -16.28%+138%
ROIC (TTM)16.89%vs 1.01%+94%
Net margin12.56%vs 1.38%+89%

More like GM

GM vs DECK GM vs ROL GM vs YUM GM vs HOVNP GM vs RACE GM vs ULTA

More like HLT

HLT vs DECK HLT vs ROL HLT vs YUM HLT vs HOVNP HLT vs RACE HLT vs ULTA

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for GM Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for HLT

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.

Stock comparison

General Motors

Hilton Worldwide Holdings

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

General Motors

Market cap

$71.04B

Sector

Consumer Discretionary

HLT

Hilton Worldwide Holdings

Market cap

$73.09B

Sector

Consumer Discretionary

Overall winner

Hilton Worldwide Holdings HLT

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Fit scores by strategy

Strategy	GM	HLT	Winner
Warren Buffett	38D	70B	HLT
Benjamin Graham	52C	77B	HLT
Philip Fisher	17F	83A	HLT
Peter Lynch	23F	72B	HLT
Joel Greenblatt	45D	61C	HLT
Charlie Munger	22F	63C	HLT
Terry Smith	22F	64C	HLT

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	GM	HLT
Market cap	$71.04B	$73.09B
P/E (TTM)	27.1x	47.0x
EV/EBIT	60.3x	31.3x
ROIC (TTM)	1.01%	16.89%
Gross margin	6.1%	44.29%
Net margin	1.38%	12.56%
Revenue CAGR 5y	9.86%	20.09%
EPS CAGR 5y	-16.28%	43.19%
Debt / Equity	2.0x	-
Dividend yield	0.84%	0.19%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

GM leads on

Dividend yield0.84%vs 0.19%+77%
P/E (TTM)27.1xvs 47.0x+42%

HLT leads on

Debt / Equity-vs 2.0x+192%
EPS CAGR 5y43.19%vs -16.28%+138%
ROIC (TTM)16.89%vs 1.01%+94%
Net margin12.56%vs 1.38%+89%

More like GM

GM vs DECK GM vs ROL GM vs YUM GM vs HOVNP GM vs RACE GM vs ULTA

More like HLT

HLT vs DECK HLT vs ROL HLT vs YUM HLT vs HOVNP HLT vs RACE HLT vs ULTA

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for GM Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for HLT

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.