Stock comparison
Cadence Design Systems
Ingram Micro
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
CDNS
Cadence Design Systems
Market cap
$103.04B
Sector
Technology
INGM
Ingram Micro
Market cap
$6.17B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Cadence Design Systems CDNS
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | CDNS | INGM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 78B | 31F | CDNS |
| Benjamin Graham | 84A | 41D | CDNS |
| Philip Fisher | 84A | 12F | CDNS |
| Peter Lynch | 78B | 5F | CDNS |
| Joel Greenblatt | 58C | 13F | CDNS |
| Charlie Munger | 80A | 23F | CDNS |
| Terry Smith | 80A | 27F | CDNS |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | CDNS | INGM |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $103.04B | $6.17B |
| P/E (TTM) | 80.7x | 17.2x |
| EV/EBIT | 59.1x | 6.9x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 12.19% | 7.37% |
| Gross margin | 88.85% | 6.64% |
| Net margin | 21.18% | 0.66% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 15.38% | -0.88% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 12.65% | -8.76% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.5x | 0.3x |
| Dividend yield | 0.0% | 1.23% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
CDNS leads on
- EPS CAGR 5y12.65%vs -8.76%+169%
- Revenue CAGR 5y15.38%vs -0.88%+106%
- Net margin21.18%vs 0.66%+97%
- Market cap$103.04Bvs $6.17B+94%
INGM leads on
- Dividend yield1.23%vs 0.0%+100%
- EV/EBIT6.9xvs 59.1x+88%
- P/E (TTM)17.2xvs 80.7x+79%
- Debt / Equity0.3xvs 0.5x+37%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.