Stock comparison
Applied Materials
3 E Network Technology Group
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
AMAT
Applied Materials
Market cap
$343.12B
Sector
Technology
MASK
3 E Network Technology Group
Market cap
$741.85K
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Applied Materials AMAT
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | AMAT | MASK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 76B | 59C | AMAT |
| Benjamin Graham | 87A | 37D | AMAT |
| Philip Fisher | 65B | 69B | MASK |
| Peter Lynch | 65B | 64C | AMAT |
| Joel Greenblatt | 66C | 28F | AMAT |
| Charlie Munger | 75B | 65B | AMAT |
| Terry Smith | 71B | 65C | AMAT |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | AMAT | MASK |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $343.12B | $741.85K |
| P/E (TTM) | 40.0x | 0.6x |
| EV/EBIT | 41.0x | 0.9x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 21.6% | 23.23% |
| Gross margin | 48.96% | 49.82% |
| Net margin | 29.31% | 34.03% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 5.31% | 55.08% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 7.72% | 60.6% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.3x | 0.2x |
| Dividend yield | 0.45% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
AMAT leads on
- Dividend yield0.45%vs 0.0%+100%
- Market cap$343.12Bvs $741.85K+100%
MASK leads on
- P/E (TTM)0.6xvs 40.0x+98%
- EV/EBIT0.9xvs 41.0x+98%
- Revenue CAGR 5y55.08%vs 5.31%+90%
- EPS CAGR 5y60.6%vs 7.72%+87%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.