Stock comparison
Hamilton Lane
MGIC Investment
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
HLNE
Hamilton Lane
Market cap
$5.02B
Sector
Financials
MTG
MGIC Investment
Market cap
$5.5B
Sector
Financials
Overall winner
Hamilton Lane HLNE
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | HLNE | MTG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 76C | 71B | HLNE |
| Benjamin Graham | 65B | 52C | HLNE |
| Philip Fisher | 77C | 61C | HLNE |
| Peter Lynch | 53C | 35D | HLNE |
| Joel Greenblatt | 43D | 36D | HLNE |
| Charlie Munger | 73B | 58C | HLNE |
| Terry Smith | 76B | 63D | HLNE |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | HLNE | MTG |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $5.02B | $5.5B |
| P/E (TTM) | 14.1x | 7.8x |
| EV/EBIT | 15.7x | 6.3x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 14.52% | 12.43% |
| Gross margin | 69.23% | 93.58% |
| Net margin | 30.59% | 59.63% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 20.19% | 0.59% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 17.91% | 13.65% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.4x | 0.1x |
| Dividend yield | 2.44% | 2.32% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
HLNE leads on
- Revenue CAGR 5y20.19%vs 0.59%+97%
- EPS CAGR 5y17.91%vs 13.65%+24%
- ROIC (TTM)14.52%vs 12.43%+14%
- Dividend yield2.44%vs 2.32%+5%
MTG leads on
- Debt / Equity0.1xvs 0.4x+69%
- EV/EBIT6.3xvs 15.7x+60%
- Net margin59.63%vs 30.59%+49%
- P/E (TTM)7.8xvs 14.1x+45%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.