Stock comparison
Planet Labs PBC
Watts Water Technologies
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
PL
Planet Labs PBC
Market cap
$14.31B
Sector
Industrials
WTS
Watts Water Technologies
Market cap
$10.1B
Sector
Industrials
Overall winner
Watts Water Technologies WTS
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | PL | WTS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 22F | 71B | WTS |
| Benjamin Graham | 61D | 80A | WTS |
| Philip Fisher | 45D | 65B | WTS |
| Peter Lynch | 66B | 55C | PL |
| Joel Greenblatt | 2F | 49D | WTS |
| Charlie Munger | 31F | 59C | WTS |
| Terry Smith | 25F | 59C | WTS |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | PL | WTS |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $14.31B | $10.1B |
| P/E (TTM) | - | 27.3x |
| EV/EBIT | - | 20.7x |
| ROIC (TTM) | -13.91% | 15.18% |
| Gross margin | 56.05% | 49.25% |
| Net margin | -80.22% | 14.32% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 23.75% | 7.75% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | - | 20.03% |
| Debt / Equity | 2.5x | 0.1x |
| Dividend yield | 0.0% | 0.7% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
PL leads on
- P/E (TTM)-vs 27.3x+151%
- EV/EBIT-vs 20.7x+114%
- Revenue CAGR 5y23.75%vs 7.75%+67%
- Market cap$14.31Bvs $10.1B+29%
WTS leads on
- ROIC (TTM)15.18%vs -13.91%+192%
- Net margin14.32%vs -80.22%+118%
- Dividend yield0.7%vs 0.0%+100%
- Debt / Equity0.1xvs 2.5x+96%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.