Stock comparison
Applied Materials
AMD
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
AMAT
Applied Materials
Market cap
$346.51B
Sector
Technology
AMD
AMD
Market cap
$691.54B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Applied Materials AMAT
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | AMAT | AMD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 68B | 58C | AMAT |
| Benjamin Graham | 79B | 79B | Tie |
| Philip Fisher | 58C | 57C | AMAT |
| Peter Lynch | 57C | 55C | AMAT |
| Joel Greenblatt | 58C | 42D | AMAT |
| Charlie Munger | 67B | 45D | AMAT |
| Terry Smith | 63C | 46D | AMAT |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | AMAT | AMD |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $346.51B | $691.54B |
| P/E (TTM) | 40.7x | 138.6x |
| EV/EBIT | 41.8x | 186.7x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 21.6% | 6.22% |
| Gross margin | 48.96% | 50.28% |
| Net margin | 29.31% | 13.33% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 5.31% | 20.49% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 7.72% | 0.57% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.3x | 0.1x |
| Dividend yield | 0.42% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
AMAT leads on
- Dividend yield0.42%vs 0.0%+100%
- EPS CAGR 5y7.72%vs 0.57%+93%
- EV/EBIT41.8xvs 186.7x+78%
- ROIC (TTM)21.6%vs 6.22%+71%
AMD leads on
- Debt / Equity0.1xvs 0.3x+78%
- Revenue CAGR 5y20.49%vs 5.31%+74%
- Market cap$691.54Bvs $346.51B+50%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.