Stock comparison
Applied Materials
Credo Technology Group Holding
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
AMAT
Applied Materials
Market cap
$343.12B
Sector
Technology
CRDO
Credo Technology Group Holding
Market cap
$40.29B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Applied Materials AMAT
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | AMAT | CRDO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 76B | 46D | AMAT |
| Benjamin Graham | 87A | 72D | AMAT |
| Philip Fisher | 65B | 78C | CRDO |
| Peter Lynch | 65B | 82A | CRDO |
| Joel Greenblatt | 66C | 26F | AMAT |
| Charlie Munger | 75B | 61D | AMAT |
| Terry Smith | 71B | 53C | AMAT |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | AMAT | CRDO |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $343.12B | $40.29B |
| P/E (TTM) | 40.0x | 89.4x |
| EV/EBIT | 41.0x | 822.9x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 21.6% | 16.99% |
| Gross margin | 48.96% | 67.83% |
| Net margin | 29.31% | 31.81% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 5.31% | 65.16% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 7.72% | 16.35% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.3x | 0.0x |
| Dividend yield | 0.45% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
AMAT leads on
- Dividend yield0.45%vs 0.0%+100%
- EV/EBIT41.0xvs 822.9x+95%
- Market cap$343.12Bvs $40.29B+88%
- P/E (TTM)40.0xvs 89.4x+55%
CRDO leads on
- Debt / Equity0.0xvs 0.3x+97%
- Revenue CAGR 5y65.16%vs 5.31%+92%
- EPS CAGR 5y16.35%vs 7.72%+53%
- Gross margin67.83%vs 48.96%+28%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.