Stock comparison
Applied Materials
Verra Mobility
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
AMAT
Applied Materials
Market cap
$342.97B
Sector
Technology
VRRM
Verra Mobility
Market cap
$2.05B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Applied Materials AMAT
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | AMAT | VRRM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 76B | 53C | AMAT |
| Benjamin Graham | 87A | 64C | AMAT |
| Philip Fisher | 65B | 68B | VRRM |
| Peter Lynch | 65B | 54C | AMAT |
| Joel Greenblatt | 66C | 26F | AMAT |
| Charlie Munger | 75B | 54D | AMAT |
| Terry Smith | 71B | 57D | AMAT |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | AMAT | VRRM |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $342.97B | $2.05B |
| P/E (TTM) | 40.0x | 15.5x |
| EV/EBIT | 41.0x | 8.6x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 21.6% | 10.98% |
| Gross margin | 48.96% | 97.46% |
| Net margin | 29.31% | 13.38% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 5.31% | 15.48% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 7.72% | 34.86% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.3x | 0.3x |
| Dividend yield | 0.45% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
AMAT leads on
- Dividend yield0.45%vs 0.0%+100%
- Market cap$342.97Bvs $2.05B+99%
- Net margin29.31%vs 13.38%+54%
- ROIC (TTM)21.6%vs 10.98%+49%
VRRM leads on
- EV/EBIT8.6xvs 41.0x+79%
- EPS CAGR 5y34.86%vs 7.72%+78%
- Revenue CAGR 5y15.48%vs 5.31%+66%
- P/E (TTM)15.5xvs 40.0x+61%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.