Stock comparison
CF Industries Holdings
Hecla Mining
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
CF
CF Industries Holdings
Market cap
$18.7B
Sector
Materials
HL
Hecla Mining
Market cap
$11.39B
Sector
Materials
Overall winner
Hecla Mining HL
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | CF | HL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 64C | 62C | CF |
| Benjamin Graham | 72B | 74D | HL |
| Philip Fisher | 60C | 84C | HL |
| Peter Lynch | 42D | 59C | HL |
| Joel Greenblatt | 35D | 47D | HL |
| Charlie Munger | 66C | 64D | CF |
| Terry Smith | 69B | 62C | CF |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | CF | HL |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $18.7B | $11.39B |
| P/E (TTM) | 10.9x | 43.2x |
| EV/EBIT | 8.8x | 21.4x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 15.41% | 15.43% |
| Gross margin | 40.41% | 50.95% |
| Net margin | 23.73% | 17.41% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 2.03% | 15.22% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 20.46% | 66.08% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.7x | 0.1x |
| Dividend yield | 1.61% | 0.09% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
CF leads on
- Dividend yield1.61%vs 0.09%+95%
- P/E (TTM)10.9xvs 43.2x+75%
- EV/EBIT8.8xvs 21.4x+59%
- Market cap$18.7Bvs $11.39B+39%
HL leads on
- Revenue CAGR 5y15.22%vs 2.03%+87%
- Debt / Equity0.1xvs 0.7x+85%
- EPS CAGR 5y66.08%vs 20.46%+69%
- Gross margin50.95%vs 40.41%+21%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.