Stock comparison
Applied Materials
Euronet Worldwide
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
AMAT
Applied Materials
Market cap
$342.97B
Sector
Technology
EEFT
Euronet Worldwide
Market cap
$2.52B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Applied Materials AMAT
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | AMAT | EEFT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 76B | 46D | AMAT |
| Benjamin Graham | 87A | 59C | AMAT |
| Philip Fisher | 65B | 41D | AMAT |
| Peter Lynch | 65B | 48D | AMAT |
| Joel Greenblatt | 66C | 17F | AMAT |
| Charlie Munger | 75B | 32F | AMAT |
| Terry Smith | 71B | 36D | AMAT |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | AMAT | EEFT |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $342.97B | $2.52B |
| P/E (TTM) | 40.0x | 10.5x |
| EV/EBIT | 41.0x | 6.0x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 21.6% | 8.55% |
| Gross margin | 48.96% | 36.03% |
| Net margin | 29.31% | 7.11% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 5.31% | 9.1% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 7.72% | 55.39% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.3x | 2.2x |
| Dividend yield | 0.45% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
AMAT leads on
- Dividend yield0.45%vs 0.0%+100%
- Market cap$342.97Bvs $2.52B+99%
- Debt / Equity0.3xvs 2.2x+88%
- Net margin29.31%vs 7.11%+76%
EEFT leads on
- EPS CAGR 5y55.39%vs 7.72%+86%
- EV/EBIT6.0xvs 41.0x+85%
- P/E (TTM)10.5xvs 40.0x+74%
- Revenue CAGR 5y9.1%vs 5.31%+42%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.