Stock comparison
Applied Materials
Synopsys
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
AMAT
Applied Materials
Market cap
$345.34B
Sector
Technology
SNPS
Synopsys
Market cap
$100.52B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Applied Materials AMAT
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | AMAT | SNPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 76B | 57C | AMAT |
| Benjamin Graham | 87A | 70B | AMAT |
| Philip Fisher | 65B | 72B | SNPS |
| Peter Lynch | 65B | 69B | SNPS |
| Joel Greenblatt | 66C | 46D | AMAT |
| Charlie Munger | 75B | 61C | AMAT |
| Terry Smith | 71B | 59D | AMAT |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | AMAT | SNPS |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $345.34B | $100.52B |
| P/E (TTM) | 40.0x | 73.1x |
| EV/EBIT | 41.0x | 113.8x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 21.6% | 1.97% |
| Gross margin | 48.96% | 75.14% |
| Net margin | 29.31% | 13.75% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 5.31% | 13.81% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 7.72% | 13.15% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.3x | 0.3x |
| Dividend yield | 0.45% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
AMAT leads on
- Dividend yield0.45%vs 0.0%+100%
- ROIC (TTM)21.6%vs 1.97%+91%
- Market cap$345.34Bvs $100.52B+71%
- EV/EBIT41.0xvs 113.8x+64%
SNPS leads on
- Revenue CAGR 5y13.81%vs 5.31%+62%
- EPS CAGR 5y13.15%vs 7.72%+41%
- Gross margin75.14%vs 48.96%+35%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.