Stock comparison
Applied Materials
Broadridge Financial Solutions
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
AMAT
Applied Materials
Market cap
$342.97B
Sector
Technology
BR
Broadridge Financial Solutions
Market cap
$17.41B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Applied Materials AMAT
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | AMAT | BR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 76B | 55C | AMAT |
| Benjamin Graham | 87A | 63C | AMAT |
| Philip Fisher | 65B | 46D | AMAT |
| Peter Lynch | 65B | 47D | AMAT |
| Joel Greenblatt | 66C | 41D | AMAT |
| Charlie Munger | 75B | 52C | AMAT |
| Terry Smith | 71B | 49D | AMAT |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | AMAT | BR |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $342.97B | $17.41B |
| P/E (TTM) | 40.0x | 15.4x |
| EV/EBIT | 41.0x | 16.8x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 21.6% | 13.36% |
| Gross margin | 48.96% | 31.31% |
| Net margin | 29.31% | 15.03% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 5.31% | 8.38% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 7.72% | 10.96% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.3x | 1.2x |
| Dividend yield | 0.45% | 2.61% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
AMAT leads on
- Market cap$342.97Bvs $17.41B+95%
- Debt / Equity0.3xvs 1.2x+78%
- Net margin29.31%vs 15.03%+49%
- ROIC (TTM)21.6%vs 13.36%+38%
BR leads on
- Dividend yield2.61%vs 0.45%+83%
- P/E (TTM)15.4xvs 40.0x+62%
- EV/EBIT16.8xvs 41.0x+59%
- Revenue CAGR 5y8.38%vs 5.31%+37%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.