Stock comparison
Applied Materials
Grindr
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
AMAT
Applied Materials
Market cap
$339.94B
Sector
Technology
GRND
Grindr
Market cap
$2.28B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Applied Materials AMAT
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | AMAT | GRND | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 76B | 68C | AMAT |
| Benjamin Graham | 87A | 57D | AMAT |
| Philip Fisher | 65B | 84C | GRND |
| Peter Lynch | 65B | 73C | GRND |
| Joel Greenblatt | 66C | 57C | AMAT |
| Charlie Munger | 75B | 79D | GRND |
| Terry Smith | 71B | 75B | GRND |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | AMAT | GRND |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $339.94B | $2.28B |
| P/E (TTM) | 40.0x | 27.3x |
| EV/EBIT | 41.0x | 20.6x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 21.6% | 26.87% |
| Gross margin | 48.96% | 74.43% |
| Net margin | 29.31% | 19.85% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 5.31% | 31.79% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 7.72% | 97.14% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.3x | 23.8x |
| Dividend yield | 0.45% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
AMAT leads on
- Dividend yield0.45%vs 0.0%+100%
- Market cap$339.94Bvs $2.28B+99%
- Debt / Equity0.3xvs 23.8x+99%
- Net margin29.31%vs 19.85%+32%
GRND leads on
- EPS CAGR 5y97.14%vs 7.72%+92%
- Revenue CAGR 5y31.79%vs 5.31%+83%
- EV/EBIT20.6xvs 41.0x+50%
- Gross margin74.43%vs 48.96%+34%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.