Stock comparison
Applied Materials
TE Connectivity
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
AMAT
Applied Materials
Market cap
$343.12B
Sector
Technology
TEL
TE Connectivity
Market cap
$59.19B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Applied Materials AMAT
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | AMAT | TEL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 76B | 61C | AMAT |
| Benjamin Graham | 87A | 70B | AMAT |
| Philip Fisher | 65B | 36D | AMAT |
| Peter Lynch | 65B | 26F | AMAT |
| Joel Greenblatt | 66C | 46D | AMAT |
| Charlie Munger | 75B | 51C | AMAT |
| Terry Smith | 71B | 50D | AMAT |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | AMAT | TEL |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $343.12B | $59.19B |
| P/E (TTM) | 40.0x | 20.7x |
| EV/EBIT | 41.0x | 20.1x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 21.6% | 13.3% |
| Gross margin | 48.96% | 35.36% |
| Net margin | 29.31% | 15.69% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 5.31% | 3.45% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 7.72% | -2.46% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.3x | 0.4x |
| Dividend yield | 0.45% | 1.38% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
AMAT leads on
- EPS CAGR 5y7.72%vs -2.46%+132%
- Market cap$343.12Bvs $59.19B+83%
- Net margin29.31%vs 15.69%+46%
- ROIC (TTM)21.6%vs 13.3%+38%
TEL leads on
- Dividend yield1.38%vs 0.45%+68%
- EV/EBIT20.1xvs 41.0x+51%
- P/E (TTM)20.7xvs 40.0x+48%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.