Stock comparison
Cintas
CTAS$69.19BIndustrials Market cap, Sector
Parsons
PSN$5.75BIndustrials Market cap, Sector
Overall winner
Cintas
CTAS 70 PSN
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
Fit scores by strategy
CTAS7wins
0winsPSN
77B
D51
84B
D55
72B
D45
68C
D46
69C
F25
80B
F33
75B
F39
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | CTAS | PSN |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | Winner: $69.19B | $5.75B |
| P/E (TTM) | 34.9x | 23.7x Winner |
| EV/EBIT | 29.7x | 16.2x Winner |
| ROIC (TTM) | Winner: 23.17% | 7.04% |
| Gross margin | Winner: 50.36% | 22.77% |
| Net margin | Winner: 17.57% | 3.62% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 9.79% | 14.83% Winner |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 14.24% | 38.17% Winner |
| Debt / Equity | Winner: 0.6x | 0.6x |
| Dividend yield | Winner: 1.07% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
CTAS leads on
- Dividend yield1.07%vs 0.0%+100%
- Market cap$69.19Bvs $5.75B+92%
- Net margin17.57%vs 3.62%+79%
- ROIC (TTM)23.17%vs 7.04%+70%
PSN leads on
- EPS CAGR 5y38.17%vs 14.24%+63%
- EV/EBIT16.2xvs 29.7x+45%
- Revenue CAGR 5y14.83%vs 9.79%+34%
- P/E (TTM)23.7xvs 34.9x+32%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.