Stock comparison
Applied Materials
Commvault Systems
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
AMAT
Applied Materials
Market cap
$339.94B
Sector
Technology
CVLT
Commvault Systems
Market cap
$4.31B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Applied Materials AMAT
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | AMAT | CVLT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 76B | 60C | AMAT |
| Benjamin Graham | 87A | 61D | AMAT |
| Philip Fisher | 65B | 64C | AMAT |
| Peter Lynch | 65B | 78B | CVLT |
| Joel Greenblatt | 66C | 47D | AMAT |
| Charlie Munger | 75B | 53D | AMAT |
| Terry Smith | 71B | 54C | AMAT |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | AMAT | CVLT |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $339.94B | $4.31B |
| P/E (TTM) | 40.0x | 63.4x |
| EV/EBIT | 41.0x | 43.5x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 21.6% | 5.75% |
| Gross margin | 48.96% | 80.93% |
| Net margin | 29.31% | 5.97% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 5.31% | 11.36% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 7.72% | 21.45% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.3x | 122.4x |
| Dividend yield | 0.45% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
AMAT leads on
- Dividend yield0.45%vs 0.0%+100%
- Debt / Equity0.3xvs 122.4x+100%
- Market cap$339.94Bvs $4.31B+99%
- Net margin29.31%vs 5.97%+80%
CVLT leads on
- EPS CAGR 5y21.45%vs 7.72%+64%
- Revenue CAGR 5y11.36%vs 5.31%+53%
- Gross margin80.93%vs 48.96%+40%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.