Stock comparison
Applied Materials
Netskope
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
AMAT
Applied Materials
Market cap
$346.51B
Sector
Technology
NTSK
Netskope
Market cap
$4.49B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Applied Materials AMAT
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | AMAT | NTSK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 76B | 23F | AMAT |
| Benjamin Graham | 87A | 66D | AMAT |
| Philip Fisher | 66B | 39D | AMAT |
| Peter Lynch | 65B | 71B | NTSK |
| Joel Greenblatt | 66C | 0F | AMAT |
| Charlie Munger | 75B | 23F | AMAT |
| Terry Smith | 71B | 27F | AMAT |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | AMAT | NTSK |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $346.51B | $4.49B |
| P/E (TTM) | 40.7x | - |
| EV/EBIT | 41.8x | - |
| ROIC (TTM) | 21.6% | -59.24% |
| Gross margin | 48.96% | 68.08% |
| Net margin | 29.31% | -95.82% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 5.31% | 32.0% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 7.72% | - |
| Debt / Equity | 0.3x | 3.9x |
| Dividend yield | 0.42% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
AMAT leads on
- ROIC (TTM)21.6%vs -59.24%+136%
- Net margin29.31%vs -95.82%+131%
- Dividend yield0.42%vs 0.0%+100%
- Market cap$346.51Bvs $4.49B+99%
NTSK leads on
- EV/EBIT-vs 41.8x+117%
- P/E (TTM)-vs 40.7x+116%
- Revenue CAGR 5y32.0%vs 5.31%+83%
- Gross margin68.08%vs 48.96%+28%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.