Stock comparison
Applied Materials
Sony Group
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
AMAT
Applied Materials
Market cap
$342.97B
Sector
Technology
SONY
Sony Group
Market cap
$130.8B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Applied Materials AMAT
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | AMAT | SONY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 76B | 33F | AMAT |
| Benjamin Graham | 87A | 38D | AMAT |
| Philip Fisher | 65B | 35D | AMAT |
| Peter Lynch | 65B | 34F | AMAT |
| Joel Greenblatt | 66C | 19F | AMAT |
| Charlie Munger | 75B | 21F | AMAT |
| Terry Smith | 71B | 16F | AMAT |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | AMAT | SONY |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $342.97B | $130.8B |
| P/E (TTM) | 40.0x | - |
| EV/EBIT | 41.0x | 12.6x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 21.6% | 10.62% |
| Gross margin | 48.96% | 30.81% |
| Net margin | 29.31% | -2.62% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 5.31% | 7.46% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 7.72% | 14.88% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.3x | 0.2x |
| Dividend yield | 0.45% | 0.7% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
AMAT leads on
- Net margin29.31%vs -2.62%+109%
- Market cap$342.97Bvs $130.8B+62%
- ROIC (TTM)21.6%vs 10.62%+51%
- Gross margin48.96%vs 30.81%+37%
SONY leads on
- P/E (TTM)-vs 40.0x+161%
- EV/EBIT12.6xvs 41.0x+69%
- EPS CAGR 5y14.88%vs 7.72%+48%
- Dividend yield0.7%vs 0.45%+36%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.