PEG below 1
Lynch's buy zone. Investors pay less per unit of expected earnings growth than the growth rate justifies. Requires confidence in the growth forecast.
The PEG ratio is P/E divided by the earnings growth rate. Peter Lynch's go-to valuation gauge for growth-at-a-reasonable-price. Under 1 traditionally signals undervaluation relative to growth, above 2 signals exuberance. Most useful for steady earnings compounders.
Last reviewed:
Lynch's shorthand: the P/E of any company that is fairly priced will equal its growth rate. A company growing 20 percent should trade near 20x earnings; if it trades at 10x, you have a possible bargain. The trick is the growth-rate input. Choose trailing five-year compound, forward consensus, or a long-cycle blend. Each gives a different answer.
Lynch's buy zone. Investors pay less per unit of expected earnings growth than the growth rate justifies. Requires confidence in the growth forecast.
Fair to slightly stretched. Common for high-quality compounders with durable double-digit growth. Worth owning if quality is high.
Expensive on Lynch's scale. The growth forecast has to materialize and persist for years to justify the price. Disappointing growth is severely punished.
Microsoft trades around 35x earnings with consensus earnings growth near 14 percent for the next three years. PEG is 35 divided by 14, or 2.5. By Lynch's rule of thumb, Microsoft is expensive on growth. The counter-argument is that the quality and durability of the franchise justify the premium. PEG starts the conversation; quality finishes it.
invest-like surfaces PEG inside the Lynch-Fit reasoning; see /methodology/.
Every Lynch-Fit verdict on invest-like surfaces a PEG calculation grounded in current consensus growth.
Educational only. invest-like is not a registered investment adviser; nothing here is personalised investment advice. Always do your own research and consider your individual circumstances.