Which is better, AZA.ST or TPG?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, TPG Inc. (TPG) currently grades higher than AZA.ST — 69/100 (C grade) vs 58/100 (C). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — AZA.ST wins on Philip Fisher, Peter Lynch, and Terry Smith; TPG wins on Warren Buffett, Benjamin Graham, Joel Greenblatt, and Charlie Munger. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy AZA.ST or TPG?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both AZA.ST and TPG are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is AZA.ST better than TPG for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, TPG currently grades higher — 69/100 vs 58/100, a 11-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between AZA.ST and TPG on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). AZA.ST currently scores 58/100 (C grade); TPG scores 69/100 (C grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, AZA.ST or TPG?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. AZA.ST and TPG are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, AZA.ST or TPG?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are AZA.ST and TPG both Financial Services stocks?

Yes — both Avanza Bank Holding AB (publ) (AZA.ST) and TPG Inc. (TPG) operate in the Financial Services sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this AZA.ST vs TPG comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

Avanza Bank Holding AB (publ)

AZA.ST$59.96BFinancials Market cap, Sector

TPG

TPG$16.16BFinancials Market cap, Sector

Overall winner

TPG

AZA.ST 34 TPG

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

Fit scores by strategy

AZA.ST3wins

4winsTPG

Warren Buffett

58D

C69

Benjamin Graham

64C

A97

Philip Fisher

65C

C60

Peter Lynch

48D

F23

Joel Greenblatt

34F

F41

Charlie Munger

68C

B74

Terry Smith

78B

C60

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	AZA.ST	TPG
Market cap	Winner: $59.96B	$16.16B
P/E (TTM)	Winner: 21.1x	47.5x
EV/EBIT	-	26.4x
ROIC (TTM)	-	3.0%
Gross margin	-	94.82%
Net margin	Winner: 58.56%	3.97%
Revenue CAGR 5y	Winner: 14.76%	-4.37%
EPS CAGR 5y	Winner: 16.06%	-62.29%
Debt / Equity	Winner: 0.0x	2.6x
Dividend yield	-	5.38%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

AZA.ST leads on

Revenue CAGR 5y14.76%vs -4.37%+130%
EPS CAGR 5y16.06%vs -62.29%+126%
Debt / Equity0.0xvs 2.6x+98%
Net margin58.56%vs 3.97%+93%

TPG leads on

No clear edges - the other side wins or ties on every measured metric.

More like AZA.ST

AZA.ST vs IBKD.SI AZA.ST vs FBK.MI AZA.ST vs CPI.JO AZA.ST vs BGN.MI

More like TPG

TPG vs IBKD.SI TPG vs FBK.MI TPG vs CPI.JO TPG vs BGN.MI

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for AZA.ST Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for TPG

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.