Which is better, CLH or GPP.WA?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, Grupa Pracuj S.A. (GPP.WA) currently grades higher than CLH — 77/100 (B grade) vs 55/100 (D). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — CLH wins on Benjamin Graham and Peter Lynch; GPP.WA wins on Warren Buffett, Philip Fisher, Joel Greenblatt, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy CLH or GPP.WA?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both CLH and GPP.WA are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is CLH better than GPP.WA for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, GPP.WA currently grades higher — 77/100 vs 55/100, a 22-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between CLH and GPP.WA on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). CLH currently scores 55/100 (D grade); GPP.WA scores 77/100 (B grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, CLH or GPP.WA?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. CLH and GPP.WA are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, CLH or GPP.WA?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are CLH and GPP.WA both Industrials stocks?

Yes — both Clean Harbors, Inc. (CLH) and Grupa Pracuj S.A. (GPP.WA) operate in the Industrials sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this CLH vs GPP.WA comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

Clean Harbors

CLH$16.13BIndustrials Market cap, Sector

Grupa Pracuj

GPP.WA$3.21BIndustrials Market cap, Sector

Overall winner

Grupa Pracuj

CLH 25 GPP.WA

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

Fit scores by strategy

CLH2wins

5winsGPP.WA

Warren Buffett

55D

B77

Benjamin Graham

82B

D58

Philip Fisher

50D

C69

Peter Lynch

57D

D45

Joel Greenblatt

41F

D56

Charlie Munger

46D

B77

Terry Smith

46D

B84

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	CLH	GPP.WA
Market cap	Winner: $16.13B	$3.21B
P/E (TTM)	39.7x	13.3x Winner
EV/EBIT	27.0x	9.9x Winner
ROIC (TTM)	7.59%	39.1% Winner
Gross margin	27.99%	-
Net margin	6.53%	29.42% Winner
Revenue CAGR 5y	Winner: 12.2%	10.06%
EPS CAGR 5y	Winner: 18.32%	12.96%
Debt / Equity	1.1x	0.3x Winner
Dividend yield	0.0%	-

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

CLH leads on

Market cap$16.13Bvs $3.21B+80%
EPS CAGR 5y18.32%vs 12.96%+29%
Revenue CAGR 5y12.2%vs 10.06%+18%

GPP.WA leads on

ROIC (TTM)39.1%vs 7.59%+81%
Net margin29.42%vs 6.53%+78%
Debt / Equity0.3xvs 1.1x+72%
P/E (TTM)13.3xvs 39.7x+66%

More like CLH

CLH vs 6532.T CLH vs SALIK.AE CLH vs CTAS CLH vs RAA.DE

More like GPP.WA

GPP.WA vs 6532.T GPP.WA vs SALIK.AE GPP.WA vs CTAS GPP.WA vs RAA.DE

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for CLH Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for GPP.WA

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.

Stock comparison

Clean Harbors

CLH$16.13BIndustrials Market cap, Sector

Grupa Pracuj

GPP.WA$3.21BIndustrials Market cap, Sector

Overall winner

Grupa Pracuj

CLH 25 GPP.WA

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

Fit scores by strategy

CLH2wins

5winsGPP.WA

Warren Buffett

55D

B77

Benjamin Graham

82B

D58

Philip Fisher

50D

C69

Peter Lynch

57D

D45

Joel Greenblatt

41F

D56

Charlie Munger

46D

B77

Terry Smith

46D

B84

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	CLH	GPP.WA
Market cap	Winner: $16.13B	$3.21B
P/E (TTM)	39.7x	13.3x Winner
EV/EBIT	27.0x	9.9x Winner
ROIC (TTM)	7.59%	39.1% Winner
Gross margin	27.99%	-
Net margin	6.53%	29.42% Winner
Revenue CAGR 5y	Winner: 12.2%	10.06%
EPS CAGR 5y	Winner: 18.32%	12.96%
Debt / Equity	1.1x	0.3x Winner
Dividend yield	0.0%	-

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

CLH leads on

Market cap$16.13Bvs $3.21B+80%
EPS CAGR 5y18.32%vs 12.96%+29%
Revenue CAGR 5y12.2%vs 10.06%+18%

GPP.WA leads on

ROIC (TTM)39.1%vs 7.59%+81%
Net margin29.42%vs 6.53%+78%
Debt / Equity0.3xvs 1.1x+72%
P/E (TTM)13.3xvs 39.7x+66%

More like CLH

CLH vs 6532.T CLH vs SALIK.AE CLH vs CTAS CLH vs RAA.DE

More like GPP.WA

GPP.WA vs 6532.T GPP.WA vs SALIK.AE GPP.WA vs CTAS GPP.WA vs RAA.DE

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for CLH Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for GPP.WA

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.