Stock comparison
Hilton Grand Vacations
HGV$4.04BConsumer Discretionary Market cap, Sector
Winmark
WINA$1.39BConsumer Discretionary Market cap, Sector
Overall winner
Winmark
HGV 16 WINA
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
Fit scores by strategy
HGV1wins
6winsWINA
53D
B80
84B
B77
39F
C66
42F
C64
32F
C69
40F
D57
44F
D58
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | HGV | WINA |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | Winner: $4.04B | $1.39B |
| P/E (TTM) | Winner: 21.3x | 31.6x |
| EV/EBIT | Winner: 19.6x | 24.5x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 4.93% | 2.43% Winner |
| Gross margin | 56.85% | 96.66% Winner |
| Net margin | 3.84% | 48.19% Winner |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | Winner: 21.25% | 2.42% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | -15.44% | 1.92% Winner |
| Debt / Equity | 6.2x | - Winner |
| Dividend yield | 0.0% | 3.84% Winner |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
HGV leads on
- Revenue CAGR 5y21.25%vs 2.42%+89%
- Market cap$4.04Bvs $1.39B+66%
- P/E (TTM)21.3xvs 31.6x+33%
- EV/EBIT19.6xvs 24.5x+20%
WINA leads on
- Debt / Equity-vs 6.2x+122%
- EPS CAGR 5y1.92%vs -15.44%+112%
- Dividend yield3.84%vs 0.0%+100%
- ROIC (TTM)2.43%vs 4.93%+98%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.