Which is better, ATEN or EFOR?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, A10 Networks, Inc. (ATEN) currently grades higher than EFOR — 75/100 (B grade) vs 39/100 (D). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — ATEN wins on Warren Buffett, Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, Peter Lynch, Joel Greenblatt, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith; EFOR wins on none. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy ATEN or EFOR?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both ATEN and EFOR are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is ATEN better than EFOR for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, ATEN currently grades higher — 75/100 vs 39/100, a 36-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between ATEN and EFOR on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). ATEN currently scores 75/100 (B grade); EFOR scores 39/100 (D grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, ATEN or EFOR?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. ATEN and EFOR are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, ATEN or EFOR?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are ATEN and EFOR both Technology stocks?

Yes — both A10 Networks, Inc. (ATEN) and Everforth, Inc. (EFOR) operate in the Technology sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this ATEN vs EFOR comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

A10 Networks

Everforth

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

ATEN

A10 Networks

Market cap

$2.1B

Sector

Technology

EFOR

Everforth

Market cap

$799.5M

Sector

Technology

Overall winner

A10 Networks ATEN

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Fit scores by strategy

Strategy	ATEN	EFOR	Winner
Warren Buffett	75B	39D	ATEN
Benjamin Graham	92A	33F	ATEN
Philip Fisher

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	ATEN	EFOR
Market cap	$2.1B	$799.5M
P/E (TTM)	43.9x	7.6x
EV/EBIT	45.2x	6.8x
ROIC (TTM)	8.15%	4.99%
Gross margin	79.5%	27.72%
Net margin	14.9%	2.46%
Revenue CAGR 5y	3.83%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

ATEN leads on

Revenue CAGR 5y3.83%vs -0.18%+105%
Dividend yield0.88%vs 0.0%+100%
Net margin14.9%vs 2.46%+83%
Gross margin79.5%vs 27.72%

More like ATEN

ATEN vs LRCX ATEN vs ADBE ATEN vs AMAT ATEN vs KARO ATEN vs ANET ATEN vs KLAC

More like EFOR

EFOR vs LRCX

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.