Stock comparison
Applied Materials
Box
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
AMAT
Applied Materials
Market cap
$342.97B
Sector
Technology
BOX
Box
Market cap
$3.59B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Applied Materials AMAT
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | AMAT | BOX | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 76B | 47D | AMAT |
| Benjamin Graham | 87A | 46D | AMAT |
| Philip Fisher | 65B | 44D | AMAT |
| Peter Lynch | 65B | 44D | AMAT |
| Joel Greenblatt | 66C | 53C | AMAT |
| Charlie Munger | 75B | 48D | AMAT |
| Terry Smith | 71B | 45D | AMAT |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | AMAT | BOX |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $342.97B | $3.59B |
| P/E (TTM) | 40.0x | 34.6x |
| EV/EBIT | 41.0x | 48.6x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 21.6% | 11.19% |
| Gross margin | 48.96% | 79.22% |
| Net margin | 29.31% | 8.61% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 5.31% | 7.72% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 7.72% | - |
| Debt / Equity | 0.3x | - |
| Dividend yield | 0.45% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
AMAT leads on
- Dividend yield0.45%vs 0.0%+100%
- Market cap$342.97Bvs $3.59B+99%
- Net margin29.31%vs 8.61%+71%
- ROIC (TTM)21.6%vs 11.19%+48%
BOX leads on
- Debt / Equity-vs 0.3x+108%
- Gross margin79.22%vs 48.96%+38%
- Revenue CAGR 5y7.72%vs 5.31%+31%
- P/E (TTM)34.6xvs 40.0x+13%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.