Stock comparison
Celestica
KLA
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
CLS
Celestica
Market cap
$41.91B
Sector
Technology
KLAC
KLA
Market cap
$235.69B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
KLA KLAC
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | CLS | KLAC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 52C | 80A | KLAC |
| Benjamin Graham | 76B | 94A | KLAC |
| Philip Fisher | 55C | 90A | KLAC |
| Peter Lynch | 55C | 77B | KLAC |
| Joel Greenblatt | 69C | 78C | KLAC |
| Charlie Munger | 44D | 93A | KLAC |
| Terry Smith | 38D | 94A | KLAC |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | CLS | KLAC |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $41.91B | $235.69B |
| P/E (TTM) | 43.6x | 50.6x |
| EV/EBIT | 38.8x | 45.8x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 29.23% | 36.29% |
| Gross margin | 11.61% | 61.75% |
| Net margin | 6.95% | 35.66% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 22.3% | 15.13% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 73.03% | 22.65% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.4x | 1.1x |
| Dividend yield | 0.0% | 0.42% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
CLS leads on
- EPS CAGR 5y73.03%vs 22.65%+69%
- Debt / Equity0.4xvs 1.1x+64%
- Revenue CAGR 5y22.3%vs 15.13%+32%
- EV/EBIT38.8xvs 45.8x+15%
KLAC leads on
- Dividend yield0.42%vs 0.0%+100%
- Market cap$235.69Bvs $41.91B+82%
- Gross margin61.75%vs 11.61%+81%
- Net margin35.66%vs 6.95%+81%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.