Which is better, DECK or GM?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) currently grades higher than GM — 77/100 (B grade) vs 38/100 (D). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — DECK wins on Warren Buffett, Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, Peter Lynch, Joel Greenblatt, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith; GM wins on none. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy DECK or GM?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both DECK and GM are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is DECK better than GM for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, DECK currently grades higher — 77/100 vs 38/100, a 39-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between DECK and GM on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). DECK currently scores 77/100 (B grade); GM scores 38/100 (D grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, DECK or GM?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. DECK and GM are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, DECK or GM?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are DECK and GM both Consumer Cyclical stocks?

Yes — both Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) and General Motors Company (GM) operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this DECK vs GM comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

Deckers Outdoor

DECK$15.14BConsumer Discretionary Market cap, Sector

General Motors

GM$71.04BConsumer Discretionary Market cap, Sector

Overall winner

Deckers Outdoor

DECK 70 GM

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

Fit scores by strategy

DECK7wins

0winsGM

Warren Buffett

77B

F38

Benjamin Graham

72B

D52

Philip Fisher

77B

F17

Peter Lynch

61C

F23

Joel Greenblatt

52D

D45

Charlie Munger

76B

F22

Terry Smith

83B

F22

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	DECK	GM
Market cap	$15.14B	$71.04B Winner
P/E (TTM)	Winner: 13.2x	27.1x
EV/EBIT	Winner: 9.8x	60.3x
ROIC (TTM)	Winner: 32.7%	1.01%
Gross margin	Winner: 57.54%	6.1%
Net margin	Winner: 19.35%	1.38%
Revenue CAGR 5y	Winner: 18.3%	9.86%
EPS CAGR 5y	Winner: 29.38%	-16.28%
Debt / Equity	Winner: 0.1x	2.0x
Dividend yield	0.0%	0.84% Winner

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

DECK leads on

EPS CAGR 5y29.38%vs -16.28%+155%
ROIC (TTM)32.7%vs 1.01%+97%
Debt / Equity0.1xvs 2.0x+94%
Net margin19.35%vs 1.38%+93%

GM leads on

Dividend yield0.84%vs 0.0%+100%
Market cap$71.04Bvs $15.14B+79%

More like DECK

DECK vs GAW.L DECK vs GRGD.TO DECK vs 2059.TW DECK vs RMS.PA

More like GM

GM vs GAW.L GM vs GRGD.TO GM vs 2059.TW GM vs RMS.PA

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for DECK Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for GM

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.

Stock comparison

Deckers Outdoor

DECK$15.14BConsumer Discretionary Market cap, Sector

General Motors

GM$71.04BConsumer Discretionary Market cap, Sector

Overall winner

Deckers Outdoor

DECK 70 GM

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

Fit scores by strategy

DECK7wins

0winsGM

Warren Buffett

77B

F38

Benjamin Graham

72B

D52

Philip Fisher

77B

F17

Peter Lynch

61C

F23

Joel Greenblatt

52D

D45

Charlie Munger

76B

F22

Terry Smith

83B

F22

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	DECK	GM
Market cap	$15.14B	$71.04B Winner
P/E (TTM)	Winner: 13.2x	27.1x
EV/EBIT	Winner: 9.8x	60.3x
ROIC (TTM)	Winner: 32.7%	1.01%
Gross margin	Winner: 57.54%	6.1%
Net margin	Winner: 19.35%	1.38%
Revenue CAGR 5y	Winner: 18.3%	9.86%
EPS CAGR 5y	Winner: 29.38%	-16.28%
Debt / Equity	Winner: 0.1x	2.0x
Dividend yield	0.0%	0.84% Winner

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

DECK leads on

EPS CAGR 5y29.38%vs -16.28%+155%
ROIC (TTM)32.7%vs 1.01%+97%
Debt / Equity0.1xvs 2.0x+94%
Net margin19.35%vs 1.38%+93%

GM leads on

Dividend yield0.84%vs 0.0%+100%
Market cap$71.04Bvs $15.14B+79%

More like DECK

DECK vs GAW.L DECK vs GRGD.TO DECK vs 2059.TW DECK vs RMS.PA

More like GM

GM vs GAW.L GM vs GRGD.TO GM vs 2059.TW GM vs RMS.PA

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for DECK Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for GM

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.