Which is better, EXPD or OMAB?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.A.B. de C.V. (OMAB) currently grades higher than EXPD — 61/100 (C grade) vs 42/100 (D). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — EXPD wins on Benjamin Graham and Joel Greenblatt; OMAB wins on Warren Buffett, Philip Fisher, Peter Lynch, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy EXPD or OMAB?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both EXPD and OMAB are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is EXPD better than OMAB for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, OMAB currently grades higher — 61/100 vs 42/100, a 19-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between EXPD and OMAB on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). EXPD currently scores 42/100 (D grade); OMAB scores 61/100 (C grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, EXPD or OMAB?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. EXPD and OMAB are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, EXPD or OMAB?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are EXPD and OMAB both Industrials stocks?

Yes — both Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. (EXPD) and Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.A.B. de C.V. (OMAB) operate in the Industrials sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this EXPD vs OMAB comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

Expeditors International of Washington

Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.A.B. de C.V.

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

EXPD

Market cap

$20.33B

Sector

Industrials

OMAB

Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.A.B. de C.V.

Market cap

$4.96B

Sector

Industrials

Overall winner

Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.A.B. de C.V. OMAB

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Fit scores by strategy

Strategy	EXPD	OMAB	Winner
Warren Buffett	42D	61C	OMAB
Benjamin Graham	64C	58C	EXPD
Philip Fisher	26F	63C	OMAB
Peter Lynch	9F	47D	OMAB
Joel Greenblatt	48D	22F	EXPD
Charlie Munger	48D	62C	OMAB
Terry Smith	52C	62C	OMAB

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	EXPD	OMAB
Market cap	$20.33B	$4.96B
P/E (TTM)	24.8x	16.2x
EV/EBIT	18.6x	10.7x
ROIC (TTM)	28.23%	10.34%
Gross margin	20.23%	69.04%
Net margin	7.48%	32.63%
Revenue CAGR 5y	-9.53%	16.32%
EPS CAGR 5y	-8.1%	16.57%
Debt / Equity	0.2x	1.1x
Dividend yield	0.99%	5.18%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

EXPD leads on

Debt / Equity0.2xvs 1.1x+77%
Market cap$20.33Bvs $4.96B+76%
ROIC (TTM)28.23%vs 10.34%+63%

OMAB leads on

Revenue CAGR 5y16.32%vs -9.53%+158%
EPS CAGR 5y16.57%vs -8.1%+149%
Dividend yield5.18%vs 0.99%+81%
Net margin32.63%vs 7.48%+77%

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.

Expeditors International of Washington

Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.A.B. de C.V.

Fit scores by strategy

Side-by-side metrics

Where each one wins

More like EXPD

More like OMAB

Related on invest-like

Key terms in this analysis