Stock comparison
Applied Materials
Formula Systems (1985)
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
AMAT
Applied Materials
Market cap
$342.97B
Sector
Technology
FORTY
Formula Systems (1985)
Market cap
$2.13B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Applied Materials AMAT
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | AMAT | FORTY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 76B | 34F | AMAT |
| Benjamin Graham | 87A | 42D | AMAT |
| Philip Fisher | 65B | 36D | AMAT |
| Peter Lynch | 65B | 45D | AMAT |
| Joel Greenblatt | 66C | 28F | AMAT |
| Charlie Munger | 75B | 29F | AMAT |
| Terry Smith | 71B | 19F | AMAT |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | AMAT | FORTY |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $342.97B | $2.13B |
| P/E (TTM) | 40.0x | 3.5x |
| EV/EBIT | 41.0x | 8.0x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 21.6% | 6.54% |
| Gross margin | 48.96% | 22.1% |
| Net margin | 29.31% | 21.18% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 5.31% | 2.43% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 7.72% | 82.88% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.3x | 0.4x |
| Dividend yield | 0.45% | 1.17% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
AMAT leads on
- Market cap$342.97Bvs $2.13B+99%
- ROIC (TTM)21.6%vs 6.54%+70%
- Gross margin48.96%vs 22.1%+55%
- Revenue CAGR 5y5.31%vs 2.43%+54%
FORTY leads on
- P/E (TTM)3.5xvs 40.0x+91%
- EPS CAGR 5y82.88%vs 7.72%+91%
- EV/EBIT8.0xvs 41.0x+81%
- Dividend yield1.17%vs 0.45%+62%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.