Stock comparison
A10 Networks
Formula Systems (1985)
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
ATEN
A10 Networks
Market cap
$2.1B
Sector
Technology
FORTY
Formula Systems (1985)
Market cap
$2.13B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
A10 Networks ATEN
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | ATEN | FORTY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 75B | 34F | ATEN |
| Benjamin Graham | 92A | 42D | ATEN |
| Philip Fisher | 58C | 36D | ATEN |
| Peter Lynch | 27F | 45D | FORTY |
| Joel Greenblatt | 52C | 28F | ATEN |
| Charlie Munger | 74C | 29F | ATEN |
| Terry Smith | 70B | 19F | ATEN |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | ATEN | FORTY |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $2.1B | $2.13B |
| P/E (TTM) | 43.9x | 3.5x |
| EV/EBIT | 45.2x | 8.0x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 8.15% | 6.54% |
| Gross margin | 79.5% | 22.1% |
| Net margin | 14.9% | 21.18% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 3.83% | 2.43% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | -17.13% | 82.88% |
| Debt / Equity | 1.0x | 0.4x |
| Dividend yield | 0.88% | 1.17% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
ATEN leads on
- Gross margin79.5%vs 22.1%+72%
- Revenue CAGR 5y3.83%vs 2.43%+36%
- ROIC (TTM)8.15%vs 6.54%+20%
FORTY leads on
- EPS CAGR 5y82.88%vs -17.13%+121%
- P/E (TTM)3.5xvs 43.9x+92%
- EV/EBIT8.0xvs 45.2x+82%
- Debt / Equity0.4xvs 1.0x+56%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.