Stock comparison
Groupe Dynamite
GRGD.TO$6.79BConsumer Discretionary Market cap, Sector
Haverty Furniture Companies
HVT.A$523.1MConsumer Discretionary Market cap, Sector
Groupe Dynamite
GRGD.TO 70 HVT.A
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
Fit scores by strategy
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | GRGD.TO | HVT.A |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | Winner: $6.79B | $523.1M |
| P/E (TTM) | 29.6x | - |
| EV/EBIT | 20.6x | - |
| ROIC (TTM) | 49.19% | - |
| Gross margin | 63.85% | - |
| Net margin | 19.25% | - |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 23.39% | - |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 55.64% | - |
| Debt / Equity | 5.1x | - |
| Dividend yield | - | - |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
GRGD.TO leads on
- Market cap$6.79Bvs $523.1M+92%
HVT.A leads on
No clear edges - the other side wins or ties on every measured metric.
More like GRGD.TO
More like HVT.A
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.