Stock comparison
Applied Materials
IonQ
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
AMAT
Applied Materials
Market cap
$346.51B
Sector
Technology
IONQ
IonQ
Market cap
$18.38B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Applied Materials AMAT
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | AMAT | IONQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 76B | 30F | AMAT |
| Benjamin Graham | 87A | 68D | AMAT |
| Philip Fisher | 66B | 50C | AMAT |
| Peter Lynch | 65B | 2F | AMAT |
| Joel Greenblatt | 66C | 5F | AMAT |
| Charlie Munger | 75B | 35D | AMAT |
| Terry Smith | 71B | 33F | AMAT |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | AMAT | IONQ |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $346.51B | $18.38B |
| P/E (TTM) | 40.7x | 63.8x |
| EV/EBIT | 41.8x | - |
| ROIC (TTM) | 21.6% | -12.69% |
| Gross margin | 48.96% | 38.08% |
| Net margin | 29.31% | 148.08% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 5.31% | 1.81% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 7.72% | - |
| Debt / Equity | 0.3x | 0.0x |
| Dividend yield | 0.42% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
AMAT leads on
- ROIC (TTM)21.6%vs -12.69%+159%
- Dividend yield0.42%vs 0.0%+100%
- Market cap$346.51Bvs $18.38B+95%
- P/E (TTM)40.7xvs 63.8x+36%
IONQ leads on
- EV/EBIT-vs 41.8x+168%
- Debt / Equity0.0xvs 0.3x+98%
- Revenue CAGR 5y1.81%vs 5.31%+97%
- Net margin148.08%vs 29.31%+80%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.