Which is more profitable, Lockheed Martin or RELX?

RELX keeps more of every sale as profit.

Which grows faster, Lockheed Martin or RELX?

RELX grew its sales faster in recent years.

Which is cheaper, Lockheed Martin or RELX?

RELX costs less for each unit of yearly profit (lower P/E).

Which has less debt, Lockheed Martin or RELX?

Lockheed Martin would need fewer years of earnings to pay off its debt.

Lockheed MartinLMTvs

RELXRELX

Lockheed Martin vs RELX stock

Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.

In one sentence

Lockheed Martin has less debt. RELX is more profitable, grows faster and is cheaper for its profits.

Side by side

	Lockheed Martin	RELX
	$138 billion	$70.3 billion
	6.7%	21.5%
	+2.8%	+3.9%
	27.4×	25.8×
	2.0 years	2.1 years
	20.1%	22.0%
	2.5%	2.2%

Open Lockheed Martin Open RELX

How we compare

Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.

More comparisons: Lockheed Martin vs Rocket Lab · Lockheed Martin vs RTX · Lockheed Martin vs SpaceX · Lockheed Martin vs Trane Technologies · RELX vs 3M · RELX vs Northrop Grumman · RELX vs Norfolk Southern · RELX vs Parker-Hannifin