Which is better, LRCX or SAIC?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) currently grades higher than SAIC — 78/100 (B grade) vs 44/100 (D). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — LRCX wins on Warren Buffett, Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, Peter Lynch, Joel Greenblatt, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith; SAIC wins on none. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy LRCX or SAIC?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both LRCX and SAIC are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is LRCX better than SAIC for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, LRCX currently grades higher — 78/100 vs 44/100, a 34-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between LRCX and SAIC on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). LRCX currently scores 78/100 (B grade); SAIC scores 44/100 (D grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, LRCX or SAIC?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. LRCX and SAIC are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, LRCX or SAIC?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are LRCX and SAIC both Technology stocks?

Yes — both Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) and Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) operate in the Technology sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this LRCX vs SAIC comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

Lam Research

Science Applications International

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

LRCX

Lam Research

Market cap

$381.86B

Sector

Technology

SAIC

Science Applications International

Market cap

$4.31B

Sector

Technology

Overall winner

Lam Research LRCX

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Fit scores by strategy

Strategy	LRCX	SAIC	Winner
Warren Buffett	78B	44D	LRCX
Benjamin Graham	88A	60C	LRCX
Philip Fisher	76B	29F	LRCX
Peter Lynch	69B	31F	LRCX
Joel Greenblatt	84C	31F	LRCX
Charlie Munger	86A	34F	LRCX
Terry Smith	88A	36D	LRCX

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	LRCX	SAIC
Market cap	$381.86B	$4.31B
P/E (TTM)	55.4x	11.9x
EV/EBIT	62.9x	12.8x
ROIC (TTM)	42.79%	10.84%
Gross margin	49.98%	12.01%
Net margin	30.94%	4.93%
Revenue CAGR 5y	5.96%	-0.45%
EPS CAGR 5y	11.27%	12.59%
Debt / Equity	0.4x	1.8x
Dividend yield	0.34%	1.56%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

LRCX leads on

Revenue CAGR 5y5.96%vs -0.45%+108%
Market cap$381.86Bvs $4.31B+99%
Net margin30.94%vs 4.93%+84%
Debt / Equity0.4xvs 1.8x+80%

SAIC leads on

EV/EBIT12.8xvs 62.9x+80%
P/E (TTM)11.9xvs 55.4x+78%
Dividend yield1.56%vs 0.34%+78%
EPS CAGR 5y12.59%vs 11.27%+10%

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.

Lam Research

Science Applications International

Fit scores by strategy

Side-by-side metrics

Where each one wins

More like LRCX

More like SAIC

Related on invest-like

Key terms in this analysis