Stock comparison
Applied Materials
Science Applications International
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
AMAT
Applied Materials
Market cap
$342.97B
Sector
Technology
SAIC
Science Applications International
Market cap
$4.31B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Applied Materials AMAT
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | AMAT | SAIC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 76B | 44D | AMAT |
| Benjamin Graham | 87A | 60C | AMAT |
| Philip Fisher | 65B | 29F | AMAT |
| Peter Lynch | 65B | 31F | AMAT |
| Joel Greenblatt | 66C | 31F | AMAT |
| Charlie Munger | 75B | 34F | AMAT |
| Terry Smith | 71B | 36D | AMAT |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | AMAT | SAIC |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $342.97B | $4.31B |
| P/E (TTM) | 40.0x | 11.9x |
| EV/EBIT | 41.0x | 12.8x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 21.6% | 10.84% |
| Gross margin | 48.96% | 12.01% |
| Net margin | 29.31% | 4.93% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 5.31% | -0.45% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 7.72% | 12.59% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.3x | 1.8x |
| Dividend yield | 0.45% | 1.56% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
AMAT leads on
- Revenue CAGR 5y5.31%vs -0.45%+108%
- Market cap$342.97Bvs $4.31B+99%
- Debt / Equity0.3xvs 1.8x+85%
- Net margin29.31%vs 4.93%+83%
SAIC leads on
- Dividend yield1.56%vs 0.45%+71%
- P/E (TTM)11.9xvs 40.0x+70%
- EV/EBIT12.8xvs 41.0x+69%
- EPS CAGR 5y12.59%vs 7.72%+39%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.