Stock comparison
Lam Research
Science Applications International
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
LRCX
Lam Research
Market cap
$381.86B
Sector
Technology
SAIC
Science Applications International
Market cap
$4.31B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Lam Research LRCX
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | LRCX | SAIC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 78B | 44D | LRCX |
| Benjamin Graham | 88A | 60C | LRCX |
| Philip Fisher | 76B | 29F | LRCX |
| Peter Lynch | 69B | 31F | LRCX |
| Joel Greenblatt | 84C | 31F | LRCX |
| Charlie Munger | 86A | 34F | LRCX |
| Terry Smith | 88A | 36D | LRCX |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | LRCX | SAIC |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $381.86B | $4.31B |
| P/E (TTM) | 55.4x | 11.9x |
| EV/EBIT | 62.9x | 12.8x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 42.79% | 10.84% |
| Gross margin | 49.98% | 12.01% |
| Net margin | 30.94% | 4.93% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 5.96% | -0.45% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 11.27% | 12.59% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.4x | 1.8x |
| Dividend yield | 0.34% | 1.56% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
LRCX leads on
- Revenue CAGR 5y5.96%vs -0.45%+108%
- Market cap$381.86Bvs $4.31B+99%
- Net margin30.94%vs 4.93%+84%
- Debt / Equity0.4xvs 1.8x+80%
SAIC leads on
- EV/EBIT12.8xvs 62.9x+80%
- P/E (TTM)11.9xvs 55.4x+78%
- Dividend yield1.56%vs 0.34%+78%
- EPS CAGR 5y12.59%vs 11.27%+10%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.